Firm OverviewAttorney ProfilesPractice AreasRecent DecisionsResource LinksContact UsHome
MCGivern, Gilliard & Curthoys - A Professional Corporation
To speak to an attorney about your case call 918-584-3391, 405-942-7800


Dear Clients:

The Oklahoma Supreme Court last week held that the last employer or insurer is not solely liable for all damages due to a cumulative trauma Workers' Compensation injury if the date of awareness of the injury predates the October 23, 2001, amendment to the Workers' Compensation statutes.

85 O.S. Section 11(B)(5), one of the key 2001 amendments, has been the subject of vigorous debate since its enactment. The purpose of Sec. 11(B)(5) was to reduce litigation in claims which involve cumulative trauma where multiple insurance carriers provided coverage during a claimant's tenure. Essentially, the Legislature intended for cumulative trauma claims to be viewed as similar to those involving "occupational disease," which are covered under 85 O.S. Sec.11(B)(4). Disputes between insurance carriers in occupational disease claims (e.g. asbestosis and silicosis) have been almost completely eliminated.

The main concern in applying Sec. 11(B)(5) to everyday practice was what controls – the date of awareness of injury, or the date of last exposure? After several published opinions from the Court of Civil Appeals, all of which have held that the date of last exposure was the critical determination in applying Sec. 11(B)(5), the Oklahoma Supreme Court has finally ruled on this important issue. In CNA Insurance v. Ellis, the Supreme Court has held that the date of awareness of injury controls in claims involving cumulative trauma. If the date of awareness predates October 23, 2001 [the date Sec. 11(B)(5) became effective] then the traditional use of apportionment is proper. If the date of awareness of injury is after that date, then you look to the language of Sec. 11(B)(5).

Though the Ellis decision does bring some long-needed clarity to cumulative trauma claims, it still leaves some unanswered questions, particularly with respect to the rates for disability. If the date of awareness controls, this opinion may de facto overrule the Court of Civil Appeals opinion in Parkhurst v. City of Tulsa, which holds that the date of last exposure determines all issues, including the rates for disability.

Please feel free to contact our office should you desire additional information.

Sincerely, Jim Cassody
For the Firm

Practice Areas
Workers' Compensation DefenseEmployment LawProducts Liability DefensePremises LiabilityMotor Vehicle NegligenceLitigation And AppealsInsurance DefenseBad Faith Defense
TULSA OFFICE
Legal Arts Building
1515 South Boulder Ave.,
P.O. Box 2619,
Tulsa, OK 74119-2619
Office: 918-584-3391
fax: 918-592-2416

OKLAHOMA CITY OFFICE
4101 Perimeter Center Drive
Suite 350
Oklahoma City, OK 73112
Office: 405-942-7800
Fax: 405-942-7805
Disclaimer Site Map Email This Save This Print This

Copyright © 2010 McGivern, Gilliard & Curthoys

Since 1963, the workers’ compensation and insurance defense lawyers of McGivern, Gilliard & Curthoys have been providing quality legal representation from our offices in Tulsa and Oklahoma City to clients throughout the state of Oklahoma, in communities such as Edmond, Norman, Ardmore, Elk City, and Muskogee, and in all of Creek County, Okmulgee County, Wagoner County, Mayes County, Rogers County, Payne County, Oklahoma County, Cleveland County, and Tulsa County.